merge error
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Long Beach (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom (0.04)
- Information Technology > Sensing and Signal Processing > Image Processing (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Performance Analysis > Accuracy (0.47)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Inductive Learning (0.46)
ConnectomeBench: Can LLMs Proofread the Connectome?
Brown, Jeff, Kirjner, Andrew, Vivekananthan, Annika, Boyden, Ed
Connectomics - the mapping of neural connections in an organism's brain - currently requires extraordinary human effort to proofread the data collected from imaging and machine-learning assisted segmentation. With the growing excitement around using AI agents to automate important scientific tasks, we explore whether current AI systems can perform multiple tasks necessary for data proofreading. We introduce ConnectomeBench, a multimodal benchmark evaluating large language model (LLM) capabilities in three critical proofreading tasks: segment type identification, split error correction, and merge error detection. Using expert annotated data from two large open-source datasets - a cubic millimeter of mouse visual cortex and the complete Drosophila brain - we evaluate proprietary multimodal LLMs including Claude 3.7/4 Sonnet, o4-mini, GPT-4.1, GPT-4o, as well as open source models like InternVL-3 and NVLM. Our results demonstrate that current models achieve surprisingly high performance in segment identification (52-82% balanced accuracy vs. 20-25% chance) and binary/multiple choice split error correction (75-85% accuracy vs. 50% chance) while generally struggling on merge error identification tasks. Overall, while the best models still lag behind expert performance, they demonstrate promising capabilities that could eventually enable them to augment and potentially replace human proofreading in connectomics. Project page: https://github.com/jffbrwn2/ConnectomeBench and Dataset https://huggingface.co/datasets/jeffbbrown2/ConnectomeBench/tree/main
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Performance Analysis > Accuracy (0.94)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.88)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.14)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Long Beach (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom (0.04)
The XPRESS Challenge: Xray Projectomic Reconstruction -- Extracting Segmentation with Skeletons
Nguyen, Tri, Narwani, Mukul, Larson, Mark, Li, Yicong, Xie, Shuhan, Pfister, Hanspeter, Wei, Donglai, Shavit, Nir, Mi, Lu, Pacureanu, Alexandra, Lee, Wei-Chung, Kuan, Aaron T.
The wiring and connectivity of neurons form a structural basis for the function of the nervous system. Advances in volume electron microscopy (EM) and image segmentation have enabled mapping of circuit diagrams (connectomics) within local regions of the mouse brain. However, applying volume EM over the whole brain is not currently feasible due to technological challenges. As a result, comprehensive maps of long-range connections between brain regions are lacking. Recently, we demonstrated that X-ray holographic nanotomography (XNH) can provide high-resolution images of brain tissue at a much larger scale than EM. In particular, XNH is wellsuited to resolve large, myelinated axon tracts (white matter) that make up the bulk of long-range connections (projections) and are critical for inter-region communication. Thus, XNH provides an imaging solution for brain-wide projectomics. However, because XNH data is typically collected at lower resolutions and larger fields-of-view than EM, accurate segmentation of XNH images remains an important challenge that we present here. In this task, we provide volumetric XNH images of cortical white matter axons from the mouse brain along with ground truth annotations for axon trajectories. Manual voxel-wise annotation of ground truth is a time-consuming bottleneck for training segmentation networks. On the other hand, skeleton-based ground truth is much faster to annotate, and sufficient to determine connectivity. Therefore, we encourage participants to develop methods to leverage skeleton-based training. To this end, we provide two types of ground-truth annotations: a small volume of voxel-wise annotations and a larger volume with skeleton-based annotations. Entries will be evaluated on how accurately the submitted segmentations agree with the ground-truth skeleton annotations.
- Europe > Switzerland > Zürich > Zürich (0.14)
- South America > Uruguay > Maldonado > Maldonado (0.04)
- Oceania > New Zealand (0.04)
- (5 more...)
An Error Detection and Correction Framework for Connectomics
Zung, Jonathan, Tartavull, Ignacio, Lee, Kisuk, Seung, H. Sebastian
We define and study error detection and correction tasks that are useful for 3D reconstruction of neurons from electron microscopic imagery, and for image segmentation more generally. Both tasks take as input the raw image and a binary mask representing a candidate object. For the error detection task, the desired output is a map of split and merge errors in the object. For the error correction task, the desired output is the true object. We call this object mask pruning, because the candidate object mask is assumed to be a superset of the true object. We train multiscale 3D convolutional networks to perform both tasks. We find that the error-detecting net can achieve high accuracy. The accuracy of the error-correcting net is enhanced if its input object mask is ``advice'' (union of erroneous objects) from the error-detecting net.
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.14)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Long Beach (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom (0.04)
- Information Technology > Sensing and Signal Processing > Image Processing (0.88)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Performance Analysis > Accuracy (0.47)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Inductive Learning (0.46)
Morphological Error Detection in 3D Segmentations
Rolnick, David, Meirovitch, Yaron, Parag, Toufiq, Pfister, Hanspeter, Jain, Viren, Lichtman, Jeff W., Boyden, Edward S., Shavit, Nir
Deep learning algorithms for connectomics rely upon localized classification, rather than overall morphology. This leads to a high incidence of erroneously merged objects. Humans, by contrast, can easily detect such errors by acquiring intuition for the correct morphology of objects. Biological neurons have complicated and variable shapes, which are challenging to learn, and merge errors take a multitude of different forms. We present an algorithm, MergeNet, that shows 3D ConvNets can, in fact, detect merge errors from high-level neuronal morphology. MergeNet follows unsupervised training and operates across datasets. We demonstrate the performance of MergeNet both on a variety of connectomics data and on a dataset created from merged MNIST images.
- North America > United States > Utah > Salt Lake County > Salt Lake City (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)